It comes with a nice installer and an interface of brand "good enough". I'm not in a position to decide about such things.Normally, the go to distro for newcomers is Ubuntu. The question is, whether upstream does not mind about overriding their official icon, given it's quite different and can cause some confusion. But if that custom icon has been actually designed for KeePassXC (but got lost due to some upstream changes), then it can make a come-back, I guess? Personally I'm used to the official KeePassXC icon, but I wouldn't mind that change.
So, thank you for doing that.Īs for the application icon, the green leaf-like icon doesn't resemble the original icon. In my opinion, the latest commit that overrides the official monochrome icons is correct. However, I find them to be too fat in comparison to other system tray icons, and I think that the custom icon provided by the Breeze icon theme fits better. In version 2.6.0 KeePassXC's developers introduced their own, official monochrome icon variants. So it must have been a long time since that icon isn't used?Īs for the tray icon, its style resembles the original icon, and it's just adapted to the Breeze's tray icon guidelines. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense to me, because KeePass is a Windows-only application, so why even bother creating a custom icon for it?īut I've been using KeePassXC for years with the default Breeze icon theme, and I've never seen the custom green leaf-like icon provided by the Breeze icon theme. I can only guess that years ago, the fork used "keepass" icon name, and that's why the Breeze icon theme contains an icon called "keepass". But now, that I'm thinking more about it. KeePass is a Windows-only application, while KeePassXC is a standalone community fork with Linux support and with different branding. First of all, sorry for the tone of my previous comment.
0 kommentar(er)
